Cases 11 - 17 of 17
MILLER v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv13147
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MILLER
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Romanowski, City of Detroit and John and Jane Doe, Corrections Officers 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Malik Jeter v. Macomb County et al
as 4:2018cv12338
Defendant:
Nurse Parton, Deputy Holmes, Deputy Franks and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Jeter, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew Antoine Jeter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Personal Representative of the Estate of Kerrie Milkiewicz v. Genesee County et al
as 2:2017cv13047
Plaintiff:
Mark Milkiewicz Personal Representative of the Estate of Kerrie Milkiewicz
Defendant:
Genesee County, Sheriff Robert Pickell , John Doe Corrections Officers 1-8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Warren County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bonita Stewart
Defendant:
Warren County Board of Commissioners, Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Mohammed Arif Baig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horace Crump v. John Prelesnik, et al
as 13-1627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORACE W. CRUMP
Defendant:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, in his Official and Personal Capacities,, GARY BALL, Assistant Deputy Warden, in his Official and Personal Capacities, RODNEY ALLEN, Captain/RUM, in his Official and Personal Capacities and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN LESLIE, named as "John" Leslie, Chaplain, in his Personal and Official Capacities
Baker v. Kaye et al
as 2:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Shane Baker
Defendant:
Joel E. Kaye, M.D., Charles H. Muncrief, D.O., S. Douglas Haas, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Koenig et al
as 4:2009cv02456
Plaintiff:
Natalie R. Fisher
Defendant:
Michael Koenig, Jane Doe, Corrections Officer, Jane Doe, Corrections Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
