Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Bell #418391 v. Woods
as 2:2011cv00384
Petitioner:
James Howard Bell #418391
Respondent:
Jeff Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Benjamin Johnson
as 08-2562
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. JOHNSON, aka James Lee Belle, aka Marcus Page, aka Jeff Wilson
Lerach v. Raskind et al
as 1:2008nc70003
Plaintiff:
Richard Lerach, Richard Lerach, Richard Lerach and others
Defendant:
Peter E. Raskind, Peter E. Raskind, Peter E. Raskind and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greve v. Raskind et al
as 1:2008nc70005
Plaintiff:
Charles Greve, Charles Greve, Charles Greve and others
Defendant:
Peter E. Raskind, Peter E. Raskind, Peter E. Raskind and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hass v. Raskind et al
as 1:2008nc70006
Plaintiff:
James W. Hass, Jr., James W. Hass, Jr., James W. Hass, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Peter E. Raskind, Peter E. Raskind, David A. Daberko and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Bell v. USA
as 08-1417
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hass v. Raskind et al
as 1:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
James W. Hass, Jr., James W. Hass, Jr., James W. Hass, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Peter E. Raskind, David A. Daberko, Jeffrey D. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00366
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Greve v. Raskind et al
as 1:2008cv00231
Plaintiff:
Charles Greve, Charles Greve, Charles Greve and others
Defendant:
Peter E. Raskind, David A. Daberko, Jeffrey D Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
