Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Management Training Corporation, et al
as 22-4032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, DEPUTY WARDEN JAMES CRAIG, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, ANITA EDMONSTONE, Case Manager and others
Latausha Simmons v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 22-2052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES CRAIG, Police Chief and others
Johnson Sr. v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Deputy Warden James Craig, Anita Edmonstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warwick v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11707
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Mike Duggan, James Craig and others
Tyrice Hill v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 22-3557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRICE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, J. TRACEY SNIDERHAN, KAYLA LUCAS and others
Segler v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2022cv10389
Plaintiff:
Gerald Segler
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and James Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Segler v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv10386
Plaintiff:
Gerald Segler
Defendant:
City of Detroit and James Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Tyrice Hill
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, J. Tracey Sniderhan, Kayla Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2021cv12774
Plaintiff:
Kristal Scott
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Detroit Police Department, Bridget Lamar and others
Berila v. Craig
as 3:2021cv02183
Petitioner:
Shawn M. Berila
Respondent:
Warden James Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
