Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Lawrence v. Henderson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv02088
Petitioner:
Howard Lawrence
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. Henderson
as 1:2022cv01727
Petitioner:
Courtney Willis
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Henderson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2022cv01345
Petitioner:
Jason D. Warner
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steucy v. Total Administrative Services Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Glenda L. Steucy
Defendant:
Total Administrative Services Corporation, Robert Hayes, Christopher Stys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Houston v. Mohr et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Houston
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, John Coleman, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daboni v. Coleman et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jacques Daboni
Defendant:
John Coleman , Kathleen Meehan-de la Cruz , Hannah Kroggel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana Rister v. Mike Wisley, et al
as 13-4032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA RISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WISLEY, R. BROWN, KIM HENDERSON and others
Rister v. Wisley et al
as 3:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Dana Rister
Defendant:
Mike Wisley, R. Brown, Kim Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.