Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Howard #351897 v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Larry Howard #351897
Defendant:
United States of America and James P. Lambros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12769
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larry Howard v. Michigan Department of Correct
as 11-2487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Howard v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2011cv12630
Plaintiff:
Larry Howard
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Charles Hickey, Jr., et al v. Mary Chadick, et al
as 10-4271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HICKEY, JR., DORIS EVELYN HICKEY, LARRY HOWARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY SUSAN CHADICK, Special Assistant for Contracting Integrity, Defense Logistics Agency, LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT T. DAIL, Director, Defense Logistic Agency and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Hickey, Jr. et al v. Chadick et al
as 2:2008cv00824
Plaintiff:
Charles Hickey, Jr., Charles Hickey, Jr., Charles Hickey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Mary Susan Chadick, Robert T. Dail and Defense Logistics Agency
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lasmer Industries, Inc. et al v. McQuistion et al
as 2:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Lasmer Industries, Inc., Lasmer Industries, Inc., Lasmer Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Patricia E. McQuistion, Robert T. Vail, Karen Spradlin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Howard v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2007cv02701
Plaintiff:
Larry Howard
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction and Connie Plessley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
