Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Imam v. Aneshansel et al
as 2:2015cv02604
Plaintiff:
Missionary Imam
Defendant:
Rick Aneshansel, Sheldon Miller, J. Phillip Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3352
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Reed v. Jeffrey Wood
as 13-2610
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL REED
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4268
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Shreve, et al v. Franklin County Ohio, et al
as 13-3119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHREVE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DAWN FIORE-BRUNO, Individually and MICHAEL WORLEY, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL REED, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO, MARK BARRETT, Individually and in his official capacity (Franklin County Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy, Corrections), STEPHAN L. MARTIN, Individually and others
Reed v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22843
Plaintiff:
Michael Reed
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan
as 2:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Fred Michael Reed
Defendant:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In Re: Franklin County Ohio, et al, et al
as 10-320
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO and JIM KARNES
Respondent:
ROB SHREVE, MICHAEL REED, MICHAEL WORLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.