Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Gonzales Olvera v. Butler
as 6:2017cv00325
Petitioner:
Jesus V Gonzales Olvera
Respondent:
S. Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juan Carlos Ponce Mendoza v. Yurithzi Olvera Esquivel
as 16-3460
Petitioner - Appellee:
JUAN CARLOS PONCE MENDOZA
Respondent - Appellant:
YURITHZI OLVERA ESQUIVEL
USA v. Didier Romero
as 16-5113
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DIDIER OLVERA ROMERO
Ponce Mendoza v. Esquivel
as 2:2016cv00001
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Ponce Mendoza
Respondent:
Yurithzi Olvera Esquivel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Olvera et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2012dp21081
Plaintiff:
Amy Olvera and Apolinar Olvera
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKenzie v. Schorgl et al
as 2:2011cv14907
Plaintiff:
Nolan McKenzie
Defendant:
Staci Olvera Schorgl, John T Polhemus, Bryan Cave, LLP and others
USA v. $64,723.00 in United States Currency
as 3:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$64,723.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Maria Olvera
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund for the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan v. Olvera
as 2:2009cv14684
Plaintiff:
Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund for the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan
Defendant:
Oscar Olvera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type:
Other Statutes
Olvera-Guillen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 1:2009cv00435
Petitioner:
Jorge Olvera-Guillen
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olvera-Guillen v. Sheldon
as 2:2009cv00516
Petitioner:
Jorge Olvera-Guillen
Respondent:
Edward Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
