Cases 11 - 20 of 553
Yatinkumar Patel, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3323
Petitioner:
YATINKUMAR TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL, MITTAL YATINKUMAR PATEL and AARAV YATINBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Specht v. City of Eastlake et al.
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
James Michael Specht
Defendant:
City of Eastlake and Chirag Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez v. Lakshmi Narayan Hospitality Group Louisville, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Maria Antonia Jimenez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lakshmi Narayan Hospitality Group Louisville, LLC, Judge Claria Horn Boom, Robert Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 055
US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of v. Dada Guru, Hospitality, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv10540
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su and US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of
Defendant:
DADA GURU, HOSPITALITY, INC., PRAKASH PATEL, Pratyush Patel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Whitmore v. Patel et al.
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Sidney Whitmore
Defendant:
Sandeep Patel and Sheena Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilkins v. Quantum Hotels, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Theresa Wilkins
Defendant:
Quantum Hotels, LLC, Pramudhbhai Patel and Pravien Patel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
