Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv02597
Defendant:
Henry J. Bemporad, Richard B. Farrer, Thomas L. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11438
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bailey
Defendant:
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. , Timothy M. Mayleben and Richard B. Bartram
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA v. Roberts et al
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Richard B. Roberts, Jamie Lee Roberts, Commonwealth of Kentucky Division of Unemployment Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Antio et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2017cv12373
Plaintiff:
Melissa Antio, Andrew Emond, Leslie Emond and others
Defendant:
Benton Richardson, Audrey Stroia, Jeffrey Sherbo and others
James Matthews, et al v. Chas, Kurz & Co., Inc., et al
as 16-4146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEWS, RICHARD ADAMS, LAWENCE G. FAGAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAS, KURZ & CO., INC., MATHIASEN'S TANKER INDUSTRIES, INC., MARINE NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC. and others
McFarland et al v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage et al
as 2:2016cv10141
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McFarland and Richard B McFarland
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage and Michigan State Housing Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00029
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Forewright v. Robertson County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Forewright
Defendant:
Robertson County Jail and Cassie l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13853
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01126
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
