Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Jennifer McFarland, et al v. USA
as 23-5288
Petitioner:
JENNIFER G. MCFARLAND
Appellant:
RICHARD C. DUERSON, as next friend of Jennifer McFarland
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Duerson v. USA
as 23-5219
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD C. DUERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Poe, II, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. POE, II, DICK POE MOTORS, LP and DICK POE DODGE, LP
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harco National Insurance Company v. Cre8tive Construction Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv12546
Plaintiff:
Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cre8tive Construction Concepts, Inc., The Bluestone Construction Group LLC, Integra Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Duerson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Richard C. Duerson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tokio Marine v. Billiards & Brews, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Tokio Marine and Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Billiards & Brews, LLC and Richard C Lawhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
