Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Baker v. Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Plan, et al.
as 2:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Baker and Sheila K Baker
Defendant:
Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Plan, The Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Plan, Victor G. Digeronimo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Sink v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00648
Plaintiff:
John Edward Sink
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beslach et al v. Professional Retail Outlet Services LLC et al
as 2:2013cv14419
Defendant:
Professional Retail Outlet Services LLC and Todd Thomas
Plaintiff:
Sandra Beslach , John Brisbin , Chelsea Gartner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Platt et al v. Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Ohio Supreme Court et al
as 1:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Platt , Platt for Judge Campaign Committee and Mark W Miller
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Ohio Supreme Court, Ohio Supreme Court, Paul E. Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crone-Schierloh et al v. Hammock et al
as 2:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Crone-Schierloh , Jeffrey A. Davis , Paul T. Gonter and others
Defendant:
Timothy Hammock, Victor DiGeronimo, Mark A. Totman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sink v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Alvin Doug Sink
Defendant:
City of Crossville, Tennessee, Chad Withrow, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinks v. Actavis Group hf et al
as 4:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Helen V Sinks and Helen V Sinks
Defendant:
Actavis Group hf, Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Totowa, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
