Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Michial Dunn v. Robert Speer, et al
as 19-6238
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN D. MCCARTHY, as Acting Secretary of the Department of the Army and DR. MARK T. ESPER, United States Secretary of Defense
Defendant:
ROBERT M. SPEER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHIAL L. DUNN
Foerschler v. Michigan Army National Guard et al
as 1:2019cv00639
Plaintiff:
Dale L Foerschler and Dale L. Foerschler
Defendant:
National Guard Bureau, Department of the Army and the Air Force and Michigan Army National Guard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lorraine Carrethers v. Mark Esper
as 19-5712
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, Department of the Army
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORRAINE ELIZABETH CARRETHERS
Williams v. Department of the Army et al
as 2:2019cv11960
Plaintiff:
Annette Williams
Defendant:
Department of the Army and Mark T. Esper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chahal et al v. Seamands et al
as 2:2017cv12656
Plaintiff:
Gurjiwan Singh Chahal and Arjan Singh Ghotra
Defendant:
Thomas Seamands , Robert L. Caslen, Jr. , United States Millitary Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Tom Harper, et al v. Conco, Inc. Employee Stock, et al
as 16-6166
Debtor:
In re: CONCO INC
Appellant:
TOM HARPER, SANDRA KRUMMA, PEGGY SUE LEAKE and others
Appellee:
CONCO, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST AGREEMENT, OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
