Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Love v. Wiser et al
as 1:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Needarius Lenard Love
Defendant:
J. Wiser and J. Meier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiser v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jessica Dawn Wiser
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dupree v. Wiser et al
as 1:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Dustin A Dupree
Defendant:
Sheriff J. Wiser and J. Meier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vann v. Meier et al
as 1:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Vann
Defendant:
Sheriff Meier and J. Wiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granville v. Wiser
as 1:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Vernon D. Granville
Defendant:
J. Wiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Wiser et al
as 1:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hunt
Defendant:
Sheriff Julian Wiser and Administrator Chester Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEMPER v. City of Jackson, TN, et. al
as 2:2022cv02689
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP KEMPER
Defendant:
CITY OF JACKSON, TN, Scott Conger and Julian Wiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KEMPER v. City of Jackson, TN, et. al
as 1:2022cv02689
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP KEMPER
Defendant:
CITY OF JACKSON, TN, Scott Conger and Julian Wiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chapman v. Vantell et al
as 1:2022cv01203
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
Warden Vincent Vantell, Sheriff Julian Wiser and Donald H. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiser v. Earl Swennson Associates, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Gary Wiser
Defendant:
Earl Swennson Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
