Cases 21 - 30 of 538
Steanhouse v. Schroeder
as 5:2023cv12702
Petitioner:
Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse
Respondent:
Amy Schroeder and Sarah Schroeder
Jere et al v. Superior Township, of et al
as 2:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
AMY JERE and DANIAL JERE
Defendant:
SUPERIOR TOWNSHIP, THE BOARD OF SUPERIOR TOWNSHIP, RICHARD PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
State of Michigan v. Facchinello
as 1:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan
Defendant:
Amy Facchinello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Grice #254091 v. Hairston et al
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Arthur Grice #254091
Defendant:
Unknown Hairston, Jonathan Bowman, Kendra Warman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Amy Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Matt v. COBX Co.
as 2:2023cv11896
Plaintiff:
Amy Matt
Defendant:
COBX Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKolay v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 4:2023cv11897
Plaintiff:
Amy McKolay
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, d/b/a BCBSM and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Newell v. Branch et al
as 2:2023cv11712
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Newell
Defendant:
Branch, Sotherland, Lori A. Coleman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
