Cases 21 - 30 of 322
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Newsome v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04201
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN NEWSOME
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chase Weiss v. Bowling Green State University, et al
as 22-3941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASE WEISS
Defendant / Appellee:
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY, CHRISTOPHER BULLINS, JEREMY ZILMER and others
Jankovic v. O'Conner et al
as 5:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Nenad Jankovic
Defendant:
Chief Justice Maureen O'Conner, Diane Hayes and Ann Yackshow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Hoeltzel v. Margie Pillsbury, et al
as 22-1668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FRANKLIN HOELTZEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGIE PILLSBURY, Detective, MAUREEN BURKE, Officer, JANET MARTIN-CONNORS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LaBurt v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Maureen LaBurt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Maureen Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Susan Lloyd v. Thomas Pokorny, et al
as 22-3321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, PORTAGE COUNTY, OH and others
Mark Hoeltzel v. Lynetta Smith, et al
as 22-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FRANKLIN HOELTZEL
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNETTA SMITH, MARGIE PILLSBURY, Detective, MAUREEN BURKE, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
