Cases 21 - 30 of 362
McDuff v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv11739
Plaintiff:
Richard McDuff
Defendant:
Kristen Jones, Megan Oaks and Coleman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams #244723 v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Raynard Williams #244723
Defendant:
Rick Coleman, Kathy Sherwood, Tamerla Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lorenz v. Rushiney et al
as 2:2023cv11040
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Lorenz
Defendant:
Rushiney, Vann, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobronski v. Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv11232
Defendant:
Birger Kristian W. Rasmussen III, Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC, Marc J. Bern & Partners LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jackson #243078 v. Coleman
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson #243078
Defendant:
Ricky Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenz #743461 v. Rushiney et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Lorenz #743461
Defendant:
Unknown Rushiney, Unknown Vann, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
