Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Albiola v. Pugh et al
as 4:2014cv01645
Plaintiff:
Monico Albiola
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Dennis Johnson, Jose Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson et al v. Lincoln Heights Village of et al
as 1:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Marcus Simpson and Marcus Glover
Defendant:
Lincoln Heights Village of , Conroy Chance , Angela Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conroy v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
Lisa Conroy
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Spencer, Judge Collins, Susan Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Kentucky Bar Association et al
as 3:2012cv00505
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Hopson
Defendant:
Kentucky Bar Association, Ahren Whaley, Scott Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Conroy v. Target Corporation
as 2:2012cv12944
Plaintiff:
Karen Conroy
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopson v. Huffman et al
as 3:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Hopson
Defendant:
Gary Huffman, Barbara Lightsy, Bennie Lightsy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lebron v. Conroy et al
as 4:2011cv00784
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Nunez Lebron
Defendant:
S.I.S. Conroy, Chief Guzman, Warden Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez-Lebron v. S.I.S. Chief Conroy C.C.A. et al
as 4:2011cv00497
Petitioner:
Jacinto Nunez-Lebron
Respondent:
S.I.S. Chief Conroy C.C.A. and Roddie Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
