Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Coggins v. Andrews et al
as 2:2012cv00118
Plaintiff: Philip Edward Coggins
Defendant: David Andrews, Putnam, County, Tennessee, Tim Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. Andrews et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff: Thomas Deloy Winningham
Defendant: David Andrews, Putnam County, Tennessee, Tim Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glassburn v. Weakley County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01107
Plaintiff: Lester Glassburn
Defendant: Weakley County , Mike Wilson , David Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2011cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flowers v. Putnam County, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00054
Plaintiff: Steve Howard Flowers
Defendant: Putnam County, Tennessee , David Andrews and Jacky Farley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrott v. Putnam County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2011cv00020
Plaintiff: William Scott Arrott
Defendant: Putnam County Sheriffs Department, David Andrews and Jeremiah Sells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childress v. Michalke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv11008
Plaintiff: Robert Childress
Defendant: Michael Michalke, Mark Hackel, Jim Hertel and others
David Church v. Blaine Lafler
as 10-1095
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID ANDREW CHURCH
Respondent - Appellee: BLAINE LAFLER
David Andrew Delacruz-Slavik
as 1:2010cr20017
Defendant: David Andrew Delacruz-Slavik
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. Delacruz-Slavik
as 1:2010cr20017
Defendant: David Andrew Delacruz-Slavik
Plaintiff: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?