Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,315
Garber et al v. Benzie, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff: David Garber, Earl Jester, Debra Kay Laney and others
Defendant: Benzie, County of, Kelly Long and Michelle Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
USA v. Raymond Vallier
as 24-5395
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND EARL VALLIER
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner: Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truss v. Whitmer
as 2:2024cv11030
Plaintiff: Earl Flynn Truss, Jr.
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer
USA v. Willie Jackson
as 24-3304
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIE EARL JACKSON
Beane v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01715
Plaintiff: Earle K Beane
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Better Made Snack Foods, Inc. v. IVP HOLDING, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv10783
Plaintiff: Better Made Snack Foods, Inc.
Defendant: IVP Holding, LLC a Michigan Limited Liability Company Doing business as House Brands Distro, Vinson Bahri, 1864 US-23, LLC Doing business as High Society 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Neal v. Warden, Richland Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner: Robert Earl Neal
Respondent: Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments (Charger Properties)
as 2:2024cv10667
Plaintiff: Earl Diamond
Defendant: Riverbend Apartments (Charger Properties)
Michael Patterson v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1165
Petitioner: MICHAEL EARL PATTERSON
Respondent: BRYAN MORRISON, Warden, Lakeland Correctional Facility

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?