Cases 21 - 30 of 252
Leon Gills v. USA
as 22-1868
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEON GILLS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Gill v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00981
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Gill, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01040
Plaintiff:
Kara M. Gill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark #222915 v. Adams et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
Unknown Adams, T. Lovato, R. Sackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gill v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Resham Gill
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Martin, Jr., Tri Star Energy, LLC doing business as Sudden Service, Sudden Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Leon Gills
as 22-1065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEON GILLS
Wollett v. Tanner-Gill & Associates Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01469
Plaintiff:
Michael Wollett
Defendant:
Tanner-Gill & Associates Logistics, LLC, Duncan Tanner, Thomas Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Behr v. Tanner-Gill & Associates Logistics, LLC, et al
as 1:2021cv01467
Plaintiff:
Austin Behr and Michael Wollett
Defendant:
Tanner-Gill & Associates Logistics, LLC, Duncan Tanner, Thomas Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
