Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Schroer v. Thomas
as 3:2014cv00968
Plaintiff:
John Schroer
Defendant:
William H. Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Schroer et al
as 2:2013cv02987
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
John Schroer, John Reinbold, Patti Bowlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Thomas, Jr. v. TN Depart. of Transportation
as 13-6544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Thomas v. GE Health Choice Plan et al
as 2:2013cv13713
Defendant:
GE Health Choice Plan , GE Life, Disability and Medical Plan and Travelers Commercial Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
John H Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
William H. Thomas, Jr. v. Tennessee Department Of Transportation
as 2:2013cv02185
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Tennessee Department Of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Bill H. Thomas and Barbara J. Thomas
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Thomas v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp23426
Plaintiff:
richard h Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , depuy international limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
H. Moran, II v. David Svete
as 12-3534
Plaintiff - Appellee:
H. THOMAS MORAN, II
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID W. SVETE
H. Moran v. David Svete
as 12-3307
Plaintiff - Appellee:
H. THOMAS MORAN, II
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID W. SVETE
Thomas et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20371
Plaintiff:
James H. Thomas and Diane Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
