Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Dishawn Curry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1374
Petitioner - Appellant:
DISHAWN CURRY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARRELL WATTS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRIS ZYCH, Warden
Hatcher v. Shartle et al
as 1:2010cv00168
Petitioner:
Donnie Hatcher, Jr.
Respondent:
J. T. Shartle, Pam Steiner and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Derrick Perry v. Eric Holder, et al
as 09-4318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, J.T. SHARTLE, J. BARNES and others
Abdel Eltayib v. Stephen Dewalt, et al
as 09-6040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDEL ELTAYIB
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden, HARLEY LAPPAN, Regional Director, KIMBERLY WHITE, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director and others
Parks v. Cushwa et al
as 6:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Darrell J. Parks
Respondent:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv01090
Plaintiff:
Derrick Perry
Defendant:
Eric Holder, J.T. Shartle, J. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. Troy Williamson, et al
as 09-5198
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden, S. SCOTT, HARRIS and others
Parks v. Williamson et al
as 6:2008cv00403
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Troy Williamson, S Scott, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McLendon v. Shartle et al
as 4:2008cv01495
Petitioner:
Juan P McLendon
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle, D. Scott Dodrill and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eltayib v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00260
Plaintiff:
Abdel Eltayib
Defendant:
Stephen M. Dewalt, Harley Lappan, Kimberly White and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
