Cases 21 - 30 of 80
USA v. James Walker, et al
as 11-5910
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WALKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Zagoria v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10004
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co., Argo International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Howard M. Zagoria
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Stanford v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10001
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co., Argo International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ephram Stanford
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Folan v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10005
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co., Argo International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
John P. Folan
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Ellison v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10003
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co., Argo International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin H. Ellison
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Perez v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10000
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., American Export Isbrandtsen, Anchor Packing Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo C. Perez
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Saunders v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10002
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co., Argo International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Saunders
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Walker v. Cain
as 1:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
James Walker
Defendant:
Alice Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George James Walker, II
as 1:2010cr20035
Defendant:
George James Walker, II
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
