Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Barfield v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Maurice Barfield
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
J. A. L., et al v. Christina Howard, et al
as 22-5966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. A. L., L. L., Individually and as parents of J.B.L. and C.L., minors and B. P.
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR CHRISTINA HOWARD, In her Individual Capacity and KAMIKA JOYNER, In her Individual Capacity
Greene v. Douglas et al
as 2:2022cv12626
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Greene
Defendant:
Douglas, M. Godfrey, C. Walker and others
Mathis v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
David Mantey v. Hector Joyner
as 22-5829
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID ANTHONY MANTEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HECTOR JOYNER, Warden
Bell v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marti E. Bell
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Melvin, Herley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Roland Montel Jackson
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mantey v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
David Anthony Mantey
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
