Cases 21 - 30 of 38
USA v. Eric Burton
as 15-1710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC D. BURTON, aka Ashton James Taylor
USA v. James Taylor
as 15-1090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES TAYLOR
Willard Bender, et al v. Newell Window Furnishings, In, et al
as 14-2077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLARD BENDER, DON LAMPE, CAROLYN CONNER and others
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHINGS, INC., KIRSCH DIVISION, NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and NEWELL RUBBERMAID HEALTH AND WELFARE PROGRAM 560
Bevins et al v. Van Buren, Township of et al
as 2:2013cv14497
Plaintiff:
Paul Bevins and Linda Bevins
Defendant:
Van Buren, Township of , Arthur Mullin , Judy Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv01316
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Taylor et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp23545
Plaintiff:
Karen Lydia Taylor and James Taylor
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willard Bender, et al v. Newell Window Furnishings, Inc, et al
as 12-2059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLARD BENDER, DON LAMPE, CAROLYN CONNER and others
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW)
Defendant - Appellant:
NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHINGS, INC., KIRSCH DIVISION, NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and NEWELL RUBBERMAID HEALTH AND WELFARE PROGRAM 560
Taylor et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00421
Plaintiff:
Patricia Taylor and James Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
