Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe et al v. The Cheatham County Board of Education et al
as 3:2009cv01099
Plaintiff:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant:
The Cheatham County Board of Education, Diane Williams, Michelle Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Doe et al v. University Of The South
as 4:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Mary Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
The University of the South
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bishop v. Midpoint Resolution Group, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Edna D Bishop
Defendant:
Midpoint Resolution Group, LLC, Bridgewater, James Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Haupricht v. Contrada et al
as 3:2008cv02961
Defendant:
Carol Contrada, Pamela Hanley, Deedee Liedel and others
Plaintiff:
David Haupricht
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris et al v. McCormack et al
as 3:2008cv00699
Plaintiff:
Dwight Harris, Dwight Harris, Marcus Robinson and others
Defendant:
Jean McCormack, Ronal W. Serpas, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morgan v. Doe et al
as 5:2008cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Danny Morgan and James Danny Morgan
Defendant:
James Doe and B&R Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hoffman v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Hoffman
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership, Kristion M Timbrook, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
