Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Emery v. Baker Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01837
Defendant:
Baker Enterprises, Inc., 4141 Bridgewater Enterprises, Inc., Montrose Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heather D. Emery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00910
Plaintiff:
Judy L Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. AVB-Triangle, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Defendant:
AVB-Triangle, LLC, AVB Triangle Partnership, Division 7 Contractors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Baker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2014cv02187
Plaintiff:
Deryl L. Baker
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sheri Baker, et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., et al
as 14-5842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERI L. BAKER, aka Sheri Jones and DERYL L. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Morgage Corp. and successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC, MERSCORP, Collectively as MERS and PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE INC.
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, et. al.
Baker v. Erie Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00460
Defendant:
Erie Indemnity Company , Adan Donofrio , Patrick McMichael and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin L Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Baker v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv12058
Plaintiff:
LESLIE L BAKER
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Baker et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv01222
Plaintiff:
Deryl L. Baker and Sheri L. Baker
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , Chase Home Finance LLC , Shellie Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
