Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Thomas v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2015cv11165
Plaintiff:
Elaina Thomas
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Human Services, Wayne, County of and others
Maddox-El #166273 v. Hansen et al
as 2:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
Keith Bryan Maddox-El #166273
Defendant:
Robert Hansen and Colleen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Tarnow et al
as 2:2013cv12604
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hudson
Defendant:
Arthur J Tarnow, Bernard Freidman, Paul Komives and others
Maddox v. Salazar et al
as 2:2012cv10526
Plaintiff:
Keith Maddox
Defendant:
David Salazar, Todd Eby, Michael Carson and others
Minor "PX", by his next friend, Paul Phillips, Sr. et al v. Spaulding for Children et al
as 2:2012cv10317
Defendant:
Spaulding for Children, Addie Williams, Veronica Ashford and others
Plaintiff:
Minor "PX", by his next friend, Paul Phillips, Sr. , Minor "PY", by her next friend, Tanganeka Phillips , Paul Phillips, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Miller et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2009cv12293
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Miller, Larry E. Miller, Larry E. Miller and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type:
Torts - Injury
Ryerse et al v. Caruso et al
as 1:2008cv00516
Plaintiff:
Susan Ryerse and Jeremy Maddox #353264
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Dennis M. Straub, Richard Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
