Cases 21 - 30 of 1,237
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01578
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Myers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ferencak v. Myers et al.
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Ferencak
Defendant:
Jaelyn Myers, American Red Cross and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Myers et al. v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Micki Myers and Matthew Myers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Myers v. Indivior Inc et al
as 1:2024sf65022
Plaintiff:
Ashlea Myers
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Aquestive Therapeutics Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Myers v. R.G.P., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv10354
Plaintiff:
Amy Myers
Defendant:
R.G.P., Inc. Doing business as Quality Team 1 and Bradley J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Myers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Ricky Myers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Myers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Amber Myers
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Myers et al v. Pike County, OH et al
as 2:2023cv04102
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Myers, NewsPatrol, Inc. d/b/a Scioto Valley Guardian and NewsPatrol, Inc. doing business as Scioto Valley Guardian
Defendant:
Pike County, OH c/o Pike County, Ohio Commissioners Office, Sheriff Tracy Evans, Deputy Josh Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
