Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Kevin Cassaday v. Mike Shirkey, et al
as 22-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE SHIRKEY, MATT HALL and RUDY GIULIANI
Dmt MacTruong, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 22-3939
Plaintiff:
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS, FIRST LADY JILL BIDEN, SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DMT MACTRUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR MIKE DEWINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL DAVE YOST, SENATOR ROB MCCOLLEY and others
USA v. Rudy Guerrero
as 22-6015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDY GUERRERO
McPhaul et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11987
Plaintiff:
Rudy McPhaul and David Richbow
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Nathan Miller, Alexis Jackson and others
Cassaday v. Shirkey et al
as 1:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Defendant:
Mike Shirkey, Matt Hall and Rudy Giuliani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
George H. Rudy Funeral Home, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv11855
Plaintiff:
George H. Rudy Funeral Home, Inc.
Defendant:
Westfield National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
MacTruong et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2022cv02908
Plaintiff:
Dmt MacTruong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, VP Kamala Harris and others
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, Senator Rob McColley and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Coronado v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03155
Plaintiff:
Rudy Coronado
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rudi v. Wexner et al
as 2:2020cv03068
Defendant:
L Brands, Inc., Leslie H. Wexner, Edward Razek and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Rudi and Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
