Cases 21 - 30 of 450
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02549
Petitioner:
DeCarlos Rodgers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodgers v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 2:2023cv02492
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Jacquette Rodgers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dancer et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Tyler Dancer, Deann Winfield, Shaprace Stegall and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Debra Shore, Marta Fuoco and others
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow A. Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Warden Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Alcon Vision, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02197
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Renee Rodgers
Defendant:
Alcon Vision, LLC and Alcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodgers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rodgers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Deon Rodgers-Ingersoll
as 23-3112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEON RODGERS-INGERSOLL
Rodgers v. Hope College
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Joseph O. Rodgers, Elise Carter and Emily Damaska
Defendant:
Hope College
Petitioner:
Jennie Devries
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Rodger Nesto, Jr. v. James Corrigan
as 23-1081
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODGER A. NESTO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
