Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Costello v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 4:2019cv00758
Plaintiff:
Katie Costello
Defendant:
Alltran Education, Inc. and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Cory Chenault
as 18-8003
Debtor:
In re: CORY LAMON CHENAULT
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORY LAMON CHENAULT
Defendant:
GREAT LAKES HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Nix III et al v. America et al
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Robert Sherman Nix III, The Tory Party and The Confederate Ame Tories
Defendant:
The United States o America, U.S Department of Education and The Public School System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. U.S. Department of Education
as 2:2017cv12237
Plaintiff:
Shawn Patterson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bd of Ed of Highland School, et al v. Jane Doe
as 16-4117
Third Party - Appellant:
SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAM DODDS, HIGHLAND LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, PRINCIPAL SHAWN WINKELFOOS and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOHN KING, Secretary of Education, LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
JANE DOE, a minor by and through her legal guardians JOYCE and JOHN DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
