Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 426
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00720
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff: Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant: Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska v. Daniel Cameron, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-5832
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients
Intervenor / Appellee: EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL J. CAMERON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Defendant: ERIC FRIEDLANDER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services, MICHAEL S. RODMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS B. WINE, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky
Harney v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00537
Petitioner: Willa Harney
Respondent: Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruff v. Ohio Reformatory for Women We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03439
Plaintiff: Starlette Ruff and Starlette S. Batrez
Defendant: Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vieta et al v. OhioHealth Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv03347
Plaintiff: DR Julie R Vieta and United States Of America
Defendant: OhioHealth Corp., Grant Medical Center, Andrew Borkor and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Mason v. Cumberland Family Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00154
Plaintiff: Bronica Mason
Defendant: Cumberland Family Medical Center, Inc. doing business as Women's Care of Lake Cumberland, Family Medical Centers Community Foundation, Inc., Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Michael Gresham v. Corey Grahn, et al
as 22-1532
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL ISHMAEL GRESHAM, named as Michael Ishmael Gresham IIPSCS aka (certified) Paralegal, aka Christian Scientist Practitioner, aka Human Rights Activist, aka Womens' Rights Activist, aka Founder of Gresham's 2nd Theory
Defendant / Appellee: COREY GRAHN, Nurse Practitioner, SUZANNE HOWARD, Medical Doctor, STACY RECTENWAL, RN, Nurse Manager and others
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Daniel Cameron, et al
as 22-5451
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL J. CAMERON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Defendant: ERIC FRIEDLANDER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services, MICHAEL S. RODMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS B. WINE, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky
Intervenor / Appellee: EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST MARSHALL, M.D.
National Association of Social Workers et al v. City of Lebanon, Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff: National Association of Social Workers and Women Have Options, Inc
Defendant: City of Lebanon, Ohio, Mayor Mark Messer, City Manager Scott Brunka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?