Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02262
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Xodus Medical Inc et al v. Prime Medical LLC et al (TWP1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00413
Defendant: Symmetry Surgical Inc. and Prime Medical LLC
Plaintiff: Glenn Keilar, Alessio Pigazzi and Xodus Medical Inc
Interested Party: Donald E. Ziegler
Special Master: David G. Oberdick
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Nelson v. Warren County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Defendant: Christy Lee Sturgill, Joseph Caten, Warren County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff: Nickey Reese, Meigabelle Leigh Anna South, Clarence Kelly Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Submar, Inc v. Bray et al
as 2:2018cv02647
Plaintiff: Submar, Inc
Defendant: David G Bray, Bray, Skelton and Associates, Inc and The Bray Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosenblatt v. A. Schulman, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00992
Plaintiff: Jordan Rosenblatt
Defendant: A. Schulman, Inc., Joseph M. Gingo, Allen A. Spizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wiser v. Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00231
Plaintiff: David G. Wiser
Defendant: Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. and Joseph E. Poe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00844
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00794
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. David Morton
as 17-1260
Petitioner - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant: DAVID G. MORTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?