Cases 31 - 40 of 308
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Myers v. US Department of Veteran Affairs, Secretary of et al
as 2:2023cv10145
Plaintiff:
Korissa Myers
Defendant:
Secretary Denis McDonough, Department of Veterans Affairs, Joseph Jurasek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
George Poulos v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 22-4070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE POULOS, as Administrator, W.W.A. of The Estate of Harold Lewis Parker, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv12865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Kempa v. United Services Automobile Association
as 2:2022cv12614
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEMPA
Cross Claimant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cross Defendant:
ESSENTIAL SPINE INTERVENTIONS, PLLC, Alliance Anesthesia, PLLC, CHESTERFIELD FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
