Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Sean Houston, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE KRISTINI DAVENPORT TRUST
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, US Department of Justice, JANET YELLEN, US Department of Treasury, DEBORAH HAALAND, US Department of Interior and others
Nessel v. Clubs of America, Inc.
as 1:2023cv11278
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Clubs of America, Inc.
Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC
as 1:2023cv10830
Plaintiff:
Attorney General Dana Nessel and Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Lady Hill LLC
Swanson et al v. Hayes et al
as 2:2023cv10584
Plaintiff:
O'Neil D Swanson and Dianne Swanson
Defendant:
Robert M Hayes, Dana Nessel and Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herman Page v. Fredeane Artis
as 23-1213
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN PAGE
Respondent / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL and FREDEANE ARTIS, Warden
Cook v. Huntington National Bank, The et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Robert Cook
Defendant:
Huntington National Bank, The, Jonathan L. Engman, Tracie L. Tomak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cook et al v. Kellogg Community Credit Union et al
as 1:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Robert Cook and Lisa Cook
Defendant:
Kellogg Community Credit Union, Matthew Francis Burns, Tracie L. Tomak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
In re: Dana Nessel
as 23-102
Petitioner:
In re: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
Respondent:
ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP, ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Williams v. Muskegon County 60th District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Torrance Leon Williams
Defendant:
Muskegon County 60th District Court, Muskegon County Circuit Court, Michael J. Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
