Cases 31 - 40 of 760
Parker et al v. Ferguson et al
as 6:2023cv00091
Executor:
Kim Parker
Plaintiff:
H.M. and W.M.H.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Frances Hurley
Defendant:
Gary Ferguson, Hailey Mosley, Lisa Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joel Carter v. Darnell Mandy, et al
as 23-1444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL MARCEL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] MANDY, MDOC Sergeant, [UNKNOWN] FREEMAN, MDOC Correctional Officer, DARNELL MANDY, MDOC Sergeant and others
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Jeremiah Hoskins, DeMarcus Bush and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgeson v. Freeman
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morgeson
Defendant:
Jonathan freeman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Bolden Tire and Trailer Repair, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Freeman
Defendant:
Bolden Tire and Trailer Repair, LLC and Carin Bolden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwayne Davis v. Thomas Mackie, et al
as 23-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE DAVIS, named as Dwayne Davis El
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN THOMAS P. MACKIE, A. HASKEY, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. BASSETT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
