Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv13804
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Engle v. Wiseman et al
as 3:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Raymond Engle
Defendant:
Mary Wiseman, Barack Obama, Patrick Leahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Easterling et al
as 1:2009cv01199
Petitioner:
Terry L. Roberts
Respondent:
Joe Easterling, Stephen D. Jackson and G. Robert Radford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karlos Harris v. G. Robert Cotton Correctional, et al
as 09-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLOS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. ROBERT COTTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and PARSONS, Sergeant
Charles Murphy, Jr. v. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, et al
as 09-5371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES M. MURPHY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, BERNICE B. DONALD and others
Lonner Melton v. Michigan Corrections Commissio, et al
as 09-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNER MELTON
Defendant:
MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden, Director, Department of Corrections, DOUGLAS VASBINDER, Warden, Warden of G. Robert Cotten Correctional Facility and others
Harris v. G Robert Cotton Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2009cv11006
Plaintiff:
Karlos Harris
Defendant:
G Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and Parsons
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Murphy v. Kollar-Kotelly et al
as 1:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Ellen Segal Huvelle, Bernice B. Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Awala v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2007cv11146
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, John G. Roberts, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
