Cases 31 - 40 of 256
Knott v. West et al
as 4:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Issac S. Knott
Defendant:
Mary West and Rick Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03193
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akins v. City of Louisville Ky et al
as 3:2021cv00276
Defendant:
Det Sgt Omar Lee, P.I.U. Sgt Amanda Tolle/Seelye, Mayor Greg Fischer and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick D'Keith Akins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Dowling et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Shawn Dannels, Daron Hall, Jack E. Dowling and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Lane, et al.
as 3:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Sgt. Briana Jackson, Amber Thomas, Sgt. f/n/u Voyles and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. King
Cause Of Action: 04 U.S.C. § 0051
Gentry v. Centro, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02214
Defendant:
Centro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kayla Gentry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Howard v. Byrd et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Warden Raymond Byrd, Vincent Vantell, Sgt. f/n/u Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Collier et al
as 2:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Lewis Collier, Willard Greene, Chase Halliburton and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Linsdey and Mark Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carhartt, Inc. v. Innovative Textiles, Inc., et al
as 20-1826
Defendant / Appellee:
INNOVATIVE TEXTILES, LLC and INNOVATIVE TEXTILES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARHARTT, INC.
Defendant:
GENTRY MILLS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
