Cases 31 - 40 of 44
United States of America v. Berry
as 2:2014mc50897
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory Lee Berry
Randy Haight, et al v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 13-6005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY HAIGHT, ROBERT CARL FOLEY, ROGER EPPERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, D.O.C., JAMES L. ERWIN, Warden, Director of Operations/Programs, D.O.C., AL C. PARKE, Warden, Deputy Commissioner, D.O.C. and others
Ison v. SSA
as 0:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Ison
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chest v. Taylor
as 3:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Chest
Defendant:
Andy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Chest v. Rippy
as 3:2013cv00293
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Chest
Defendant:
Lynn Rippy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Jara-Eckman et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23955
Plaintiff:
Maria Jara-Eckman and Gregory Lee Eckman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory Berry v. Gary Capello
as 12-2402
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY LEE BERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY J. CAPELLO, Warden
Chest v. Abramson
as 3:2011cv00325
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Chest
Defendant:
Jerry Edwin Abramson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Watkins, et al v. Kajima International, Inc., et al
as 10-6289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MICHAEL D. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HIROAKI HOSHINO, CEO of U. S. Operations for Kajima Corporation, RONALD M. GEORGE, individually and in his offiicial capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California and others
Berry v. Capello
as 2:2010cv11398
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Berry
Defendant:
Gary J. Capello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
