Cases 31 - 40 of 4,884
Cresci v. Cresci et al.
as 1:2024cv01279
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does, Anthony B. Cresci, II and others
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Cresci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Kroll, LLC v. Leonard
as 1:2024cv00071
Defendant:
James Leonard, II
Plaintiff:
Kroll, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Joseph Kelley, II
as 24-1605
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH LEROY KELLEY, II
Permar v. Quick Tab II, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01149
Defendant:
Quick Tab II, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Permar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Carter v. USA
as 3:2024cv00193
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Joseph Carter, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
City of Logan, Ohio v. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03547
Cross-Defendant:
Fluidra USA, LLC and AECOM GLOBAL II, LLC
Defendant:
Fluidra USA, LLC and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Logan, Ohio
Cross-Complainant:
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Cross-Plaintiff:
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Karp, II v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03440
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Karp, II and Karen Karp
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coiteux, II v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2024cv03433
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Robert E Coiteux, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
