Cases 31 - 40 of 109
John McMurry v. Michael Brown, et al
as 20-2001
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, MICHAEL BROWN, Warden and MIKE BROWN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY MCMURRY and JOHN HENRY MCMURRY, aka John Henry McMurry-Bey
Phelps et al v. SumiRiko Tennessee, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00421
Plaintiff:
Dusty Phelps, Miranda Evans, Micalah Taylor and others
Defendant:
SumiRiko Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Taylor #225263 v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Kathy Witty, Michael Brown, Keefe Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ia Tonda Phupa Trik Taylor #225263
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv12392
Defendant:
Kathy Witty, Michael Brown, Jacqueline Peacock and others
Plaintiff:
Latonda PhuPatrik Taylor
General Motors, LLC, et al v. FCA US LLC, et al
as 20-1791
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US LLC, ALPHONS IACOBELLI, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY and GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01742
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: General Motors, LLC, et al
as 20-1616
Respondent:
MICHAEL BROWN, FCA US LLC, ALPHONS IACOBELLI and others
Petitioner:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY and In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Michael Brown v. USA
as 20-5504
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL BROWN
N. Owusu v. MDOC Pain Mgmt Comm, et al
as 20-1217
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, TERESA MERLING, COREY GRAHN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
N. KALONJI OWUSU, aka Nathaniel Porter
Brown et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
