Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Commerce, LLC v. R&S Halley Co., Inc.
as 2:2012mc00029
Plaintiff:
Commerce, LLC
Defendant:
R&S Halley Co., Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00062
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00060
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Jefferson v. R&S Fitness Centers of Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02985
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jefferson
Defendant:
R&S Fitness Centers of Tennessee, Inc. and Spa Fitness Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. Collierville
as 2:2011cv02783
Plaintiff:
R. S. Harris
Defendant:
Town Collierville , The Town of Collierville Board of Zoning Appeals , Nasreen Aman and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paul Bennett, et al v. Hunter Durham, et al
as 11-5782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL DANIEL BENNETT, CHRIS ENDERSBY, EXCELLENT PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTER DURHAM and DURHAM & ZORNES
Bennett et al v. Durham et al
as 1:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Paul Daniel Bennett , Chris Endersby , Excellent Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
Hunter Durham and Durham & Zornes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUTRY v. Youthland USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Cheserae D. Autry
Defendant:
Youthland USA, Inc. and R&S Lil Feets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Moody v. Bell et al
as 1:2008cv00796
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Moody
Defendant:
T. Bell, R. S. Taylor and Linda Mahlman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett et al v. Mammoth Resource Partners, inc. et al
as 3:2008mc00215
Plaintiff:
Paul Daniel Bennett, Paul Daniel Bennett, Paul Daniel Bennett and others
Defendant:
Mammoth Resource Partners, inc., Mammoth Resource, LLC, Mammoth Field Services, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
