Cases 31 - 40 of 186
Betancourt v. KF Hospitality,LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company
as 2:2020cv10956
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Betancourt
Defendant:
KF Hospitality,LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Detroit Public Schools Community District et al
as 4:2020cv10922
Defendant:
Detroit Board of Education, Deborah Hunter-Harvill, Luis Solano and others
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
County of Hawaii v. Endo Health Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45014
Defendant:
Raymond Sackler Family, purdue pharma l.p, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
County of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yuhasz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv02606
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Yuhasz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
County of Kauai v. CVS Health Corporation, et al.
as 1:2019op45862
Defendant:
Raymond Sackler Family, Walgreen Co, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
County of Kauai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 19-3932
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN REESE, Corrections Officer, JUSTIN JOHNSON, Case Manager, JOSEPH LITTLE, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RUDOLPH PRINGLES, Deputy Warden of Operations, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Shoffnerkalthoff MES, Inc. v. Rudolph/Libbe, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Rudolph/Libbe, Inc. and La-Z-Boy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shoffnerkalthoff MES, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rudolph Baitt v. Core Civic Corporation, et al
as 19-3491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH R. BAITT
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR SACKETT, WARDEN BRIGHAM SLOAN and CORE CIVIC CORPORATION
Rudolph Hilliard v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-3260
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUDOLPH HILLIARD
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
