Cases 31 - 40 of 292
James Stevens v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. STEVENS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, individually and in their official capacity, MICHELLE SAGE, Classification Director, individually and in their official capacity and others
Alvin DavisIn re: Alvin Davis
as 21-2867
Petitioner:
In re: ALVIN DAVIS
Respondent:
JEFFREY LARSON, Warden
Jerry Anderson, II v. K. Larson
as 21-2855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY ANDERSON, II
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER K. LARSON
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 21-2787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Deputy Warden, SERGEANT BORGEN and others
Yurkiewicz v. Lavender Farms, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Sarah Yurkiewicz
Defendant:
Lavender Farms, LLC doing business as Strip A Steakhouse, Kimberly Larson, Ronald Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Larson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04016
Plaintiff:
Harold Larson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 21-2590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN, NURSE DAWN COON, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Deputy Warden and others
Nicholson v. City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2021cv00459
Defendant:
Cumberland Electric Membership Corp., Regency Associates, Cemc and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson #979199 v. Larson
as 2:2021cv00125
Defendant:
K. Larson
Plaintiff:
Jerry Anderson #979199, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karyn Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
