Cases 41 - 50 of 396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilbourn-Little v. Morrison
as 2:2023cv11394
Petitioner:
William Randel Wilbourn-Little
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
West v. Gibson
as 1:2023cv11321
Plaintiff:
Bryan Marshall West
Defendant:
Tammie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Local Union No. 333 Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan v. Galecka
as 1:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 333 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan and Local Union No. 333 Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan
Defendant:
Bryan Galecka
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ontiveroz v. Morrison
as 2:2023cv11100
Petitioner:
Anthony Richard Ontiveroz
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
West #813767 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Bryan Marshall West #816767 and Bryan Marshall West #813767
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health, Tammie Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Auk et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10897
Plaintiff:
Bryan Auk and Anthony Auk
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Alonzo Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard #610483 v. Morrison
as 1:2023cv00383
Petitioner:
Justin Howard Howard #610483 and Justin Duane Howard #610483
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beavers v. Dunn et al
as 2:2023cv10802
Plaintiff:
Dongia Jerome Beavers and Donqia Jerome Beavers
Defendant:
Bryan Dunn and William Dyke
James #220570 v. Morrison
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
Quinn A. James #220570
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
