Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epperson et al v. Humboldt, City of et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
Mary Epperson , Eddie Ray Epperson , Janie Epperson and others
Defendant:
Humboldt, City of , Robert Ellis , Antonio Buford and others
Miscellaneou:
Amanda Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Volovar v. Mahoning County, Ohio et al
as 4:2015cv00450
Defendant:
Mahoning County, Ohio, Jerry Green, Alki Santamas and others
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Volovar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Upham et al (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Trevis C Reynolds
Defendant:
Jeremy Upham, City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee and John 1-10 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Zimmer, Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv01378
Plaintiff:
A. Catherine Edwards
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. , Zimmer Holdings Inc. and John 1-10 Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01357
Plaintiff:
Karen Saunders and Eric Saunders
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings Inc and John 1-10 Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary McClain, Sr. v. Mason County, KY, et al
as 14-5983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MCCLAIN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MASON COUNTY, KY, GERALD CURTIS, SCOTT POE and others
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. American CareSource Holdings, Inc., et al.
as 3:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC
Defendant:
American CareSource Holdings, Inc. and John 1-10 Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
