Cases 41 - 50 of 595
Dykes-Bey v. Cecil et al
as 1:2023cv11998
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes-Bey
Defendant:
Emily Cecil, Kelley Wellman, Mary Velarde and others
Taylor-Bey v. Deangelo et al
as 5:2023cv11958
Plaintiff:
Leon Taylor-Bey
Defendant:
Jodi Deangelo and Heidi Washington
Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv11951
Plaintiff:
Airrick Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, 70th Judicial District Court, Saginaw County Landbanking Authorities and others
Anderson et al v. Autoliv, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv11601
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
Anita Victory, Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anderson et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
El-Bey v. Warden at FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Warden at FMC Lexington and C.O. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Abdul-Azziz El Bey v. Thomas Kehr, et al
as 23-3505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN ABDUL-AZZIZ EL BEY, aka Steven L. Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS KEHR, In his Individual Capacity, KIMBERLY MOCKABEE, In her Individual Capacity, MIKE DAVIS, In his Individual Capacity and his Official Capacity and others
Dykes-Bey v. Grand Prairie Health Care Services et al
as 2:2023cv11403
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes-Bey
Defendant:
Grand Prairie Health Care Services, Wellpath Healthcare and Victoria Janowiecki
George Rider-Bey v. USA
as 23-1495
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE G. RIDER-BEY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Brandon Bey
as 23-1485
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON BEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
