Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Moody v. Settles
as 1:2017cv00105
Petitioner:
Greg Moody
Respondent:
Darren Settles, Phil Bivens, Lee Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moody v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Greg Moody
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Russell Lee Moore, Charles Phillip Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivens v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20218
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bivens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Carter v. Tre Hargett, et al
as 16-5856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TRE HARGETT, official capacity as Tennessee Secretary of State, MARK GOINS, official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee, HERBERT SLATERY, III, official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and others
Carter v. Hargett et al
as 3:2016cv00730
Plaintiff:
John E. Carter
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Herbert Slatery, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Moore, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Robert Lee Moore, Jr. and Phil Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. Knox County et al
as 3:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Bernie Ray McGill
Defendant:
James "JJ" Jones, Rodney Bivens, Steve Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Buhl et al
as 3:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
David Freeman Clay
Defendant:
John Doe Buhl, John Doe Patrict, John Doe Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Kirkland et al
as 3:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
David Freeman Clay
Defendant:
John Doe Kirkland, Jane Doe Ayer, John Doe Barrent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prison Legal News v. Jones et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
James "J.J." Jones , Rodney Bivens and Knox County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
