Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Controversy Music et al v. Heidelberg Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00367
Plaintiff:
Controversy Music, Controversy Music, Raydiola Music and others
Defendant:
Heidelberg Broadcasting, LLC and John H. Heidelberg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brockman et al v. Heritage Radio Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
E. Britt Brockman, Jonathan S. Blue and Jonathan S. Blue
Defendant:
Heritage Radio Partners, LLC, Heritage Radio Partners, LLC, Heritage Fund Advisors LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Brockman v. Scutt
as 2:2008cv10310
Petitioner:
Ernest Brockman
Respondent:
Debra Scutt
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brockman Music et al v. Roberts
as 2:2007cv02600
Plaintiff:
Brockman Music, Brockman Music, Brenda Richie Publishing and others
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Controversy Music et al v. MI-Holiday, L L C et al
as 4:2007cv13829
Plaintiff:
Controversy Music, Controversy Music, Hampshire House Publishing Corporation and others
Defendant:
MI-Holiday, L L C and Orang Joobeen
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Controversy Music et al v. Columbia Sussex Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv13160
Plaintiff:
Controversy Music, Controversy Music, Hampshire House Publishing Corporation and others
Defendant:
Columbia Sussex Corporation and William J Yung
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sudden Service, Incorporated v. Brockman Forklifts, Incorporated et al
as 5:2007cv12975
Plaintiff:
Sudden Service, Incorporated
Defendant:
Brockman Forklifts, Incorporated and Edward W. Brockman
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Alexander v. Brockman et al
as 5:2007cv12385
Plaintiff:
Veronica Alexander
Defendant:
Ernest Lee Brockman, Southfield, City of, David McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
